eaglesfan036

with 15 votes @flyersfan1493 is a big joke

if you were making snow angels your probably would have accidentally blocked a shot at some point, but you have no hits or shots blocked either

extra tagception

@Streetlight @Banackock @flyersfan1493 @Tixe @Dangles13 @eaglesfan036 @der meister @boom @solas @enigmatic @701 @Nonsense @jjdynamite @bukss_a @Digg @JR95 @Mr.Baller @RomanesEuntDomus @JPL @jack @hedgehog337 @Cuffy @Wasty @Paramorise @Quads @svb @Storm @nikkurri17 @Gregy @Ventas @Jala @Mr. Power @YEAH!stlemania @jRuutu @Victor @brovy @Draper @sterling @JardyB10 @ADwyer87 @StevenStamkos91 @tfong @Higgins @stevo @CowboyinAmerica @DollarAndADream @Molholt @Phil @Kendrick @Smarch @diamond_ace @CoachReilly @gorlab @Frank @STZ @Velevra @Glaciem @evrydayimbyfuglien @Tim @frescoelmo @atw2592 @Tylar @Knight @fever95 @gregreg @Beketov @Gooningitup @KingRobbie @Daniel @Toast @Green @Evans @Lunaro @Advantage @boubabi @Da Trifecta @Munk @HF92 @Mike @NUCK @Christmas @Kylrad @iRockstar @Individual @Jamie @Dmoushey_31 everyone read this proposal as well please

Kendrick and Flyersfan agree on something! That for sure means this is a great idea :3

I like this idea a lot better than the other two-player proposal. Initially, I was worried that letting all these people have VHLM players would make it harder for the noobs to be successful, but the 30 tpe cap a season and 120 tpe overall cap after 3 seasons still lets noobs on the first players have an advantage. If I am reading this right, you do the normal tpe earning for your uncapped player, then you have to write the occasional extra media spot on the side in order to earn tpe for your capped player? I think the capped player should have to do Point tasks to get his tpe instead of welfare, because the whole point of the capped player is giving people more things to do on here. This would make the VHLM more active, give people more things to do, and avoid having two players in the VHL at once. Initially it seems confusing, but after reading this through a second time it seems simple enough.

The people who only post in welfare and in no other topics don't really contribute much. The Tfongs who post in welfare but are also all over the boards and my chat buddy have a lot to contribute <3

he's and updater and is quietly making a beast player, he just isn't super social I guess :3

lol @Draper just copied me

Our recruiting is starting to help increase activity too. The Adwyers, the Tims, the Evans, the Danglesfans, and the Banacocks are all startng to come in and bring their own touch to the league

ACTIVITY If you have been tagged in this post, congratulations! You are one of the VHL's 91 active members! In this study, I have divided the VHL's members into three categories; very active, moderately active, and somewhat active. Anyone who who like to view the excel spreadsheet I created for the study can click here. In the spreadsheet, you will find that I have classified the VHL as having 27 people I define as very active, 43 people who are moderately active, and 21 people who are a little active. To find all the members of the study, I browsed through the update pages of each VHLM and VHL initially finding the actives and inactive by hovering over their username to see the last time they both logged in and posted. My ratings of peoples' activity was mostly subjective, based on how well I believe people drive activity. People who I rated as very active are high activity drivers who create lots of activity by posting a lot and daily, as well as possibly holding positions of high importance or that require high amounts of activity. People who I rated as moderately active are those may not facilitate discussion, but instead join in discussion if it occurs. These people post frequently, but probably not daily. These people range from anywhere to point taskers to welfare recipients and those who do both, they just have less posting activity than those deemed very active. Lastly, the somewhat active users are those who just log in and only post in welfare and tpe related stuff, but don't provide much activity around the boards. I divided users into the VHLM and VHL so we can take a look at both. VHLM The VHLM players consist of 8 very active members, 16 moderately active members, and 6 members who are a little active. This totals out to an average of 1 very active member per team, 2 moderately active members per team, and 0.75 little activity members per team, for a total of an average of 3.75 active members per team. In addition, I have 6 VHLM GMs ranked as very active, 1 VHLM GM ranked as moderately active, and one open vacancy soon to be filled. This means that each VHLM team should average out to 2 very active members driving discussion, along with 2 moderately active members who would participate in the discussion from time to time. These are pretty mediocre numbers, and while not horrible I think we could do a lot better. If the VHLM were shrunk to six teams, it would average 1.33 high activity members per team, 2.66 moderate actives per team, and 1 a little active per team, for a total of 5 actives per team. Combine this with hopefully I very active GM, and I think shrinking the VHLM to 6 teams is the correct route to take as each team would then average 1.25 more actives per team. Additionally, one benefit to consider in the potential new rule of creating creating second players is the main people who will be creating second players are the very active members and the upper echelon of moderately active members, creating a lot more activity drivers in the VHLM. VHL The VHL consists of 19 very active members, 27 moderately active members, and 10 a little active members, for a total of 56 active members. This averages out to 1.9 very active members per team, 2.7 moderately active members per team, and 1 a little active member per team for a total average of 5.6 active members per team. These numbers are much better than the VHLM's, as having nearly 2 very active members means 2 activity drivers, as well as nearly 3 members who still still participate in the discussion. Interestingly enough, I actually have more VHLM GMs pegged as very active than VHL GMs, with 6 VHLM GMs getting the very active rating compared to only 5 VHL GMs getting the very active rating, also with having less VHLM GMs overall. Luckily, there are no GMs rated as somewhat active, as they probably long ago would have stepped down or been fired. That ratio is probably what I would prefer though, as we need VHLM GMs to be very active more than we need VHL GMs to be very active because the VHLM requires more discussion drivers in order to keep the noobies interested, compared to the people deeper into their VHL careers who clearly are interested to stay this long. Ideally every GM would be very active, but I think the moderately active VHL GMs are still doing a decent enough job. @Streetlight @Banackock @flyersfan1493 @Tixe @Dangles13 @eaglesfan036 @der meister @boom @solas @enigmatic @701 @Nonsense @jjdynamite @bukss_a @Digg @JR95 @Mr.Baller @RomanesEuntDomus @JPL @jack @hedgehog337 @Cuffy @Wasty @Paramorise @Quads @svb @Storm @nikkurri17 @Gregy @Ventas @Jala @Mr. Power @YEAH!stlemania @jRuutu @Victor @brovy @Draper @sterling @JardyB10 @ADwyer87 @StevenStamkos91 @tfong @Higgins @stevo @CowboyinAmerica @DollarAndADream @Molholt @Phil @Kendrick @Smarch @diamond_ace @CoachReilly @gorlab @Frank @STZ @Velevra @Glaciem @evrydayimbyfuglien @Tim @frescoelmo @atw2592 @Tylar @Knight @fever95 @gregreg @Beketov @Gooningitup @KingRobbie @Daniel @Toast @Green @Evans @Lunaro @Advantage @boubabi @Da Trifecta @Munk @HF92 @Mike @NUCK @Christmas @Kylrad @iRockstar @Individual @Jamie @Dmoushey_31 It looks like I missed 5 or so people in my tagging but it would take too long to go back and check the actives list and see who i missed

Bandwagon

He was a 3rd liner and PP specialist but this year he proved me wrong Also I agree with Boubabi, I don't see any harm in letting people write media spots about the NHL

Ottawa about to turn into a dumpster fire

The guy is tough for sure, but you wouldn't see Calvin Johnson or Julio Jones doing sit ups on their drive way and holding out like that. And you are correct that McNabb had a garbage personality too, but that doesn't excuse TO's actions

does it count as a win if we score first

you like TO?

1) I would still root for my team even if they signed someone I didn't like, but I would want them gone. Like if the Eagles signed Greg Hardy I would still root for them, but I would want that scumbag off my team ASAP 2) If an Eagles star signed with the Cowboys, Redskins, Giants, or Patriots I hate them forever. I still hate TO

I shouldn't have said double, I meant to say increase. Point still stands though

Bratislava claims Max von Hohenzollern @RomanesEuntDomus

Zack Gagnon II available

1) Is Smarchgay for moleman? 2) When will Calgary win the cup again 3) Who will win a cup first, Calgary or Riga? 4) If Phil fell and he can't get up but the monsta was right there what kind of weapon would the David use at Knight?

they actually completely destroyed goalie mode. I used to be able to play goalie okay in NHL 13-15, but in NHL 16 they completely changed the controls and the movement system and I find it way harder