Da Trifecta 1,896 Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Did you like your own post? ^ That just killed me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Did you like your own post? If the truth is coming out, I hate all your posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator frescoelmo 1,218 Posted March 4, 2014 Moderator Share Posted March 4, 2014 If the truth is coming out, I hate all your posts. Checks and balances Kendeezy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Checks and balances Kendeezy. I don't cash em or see em on my statements Svec-neezy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Svoboda_3 Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Did you like your own post? All my posts are equally great, so I probably hit that button by accident thinking that I was liking someone elses' post. But I did laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator frescoelmo 1,218 Posted March 4, 2014 Moderator Share Posted March 4, 2014 I don't cash em or see em on my statements Svec-neezy It's Svec-Nasty. ORRRRRR -Natty like Natty Ice. Bitch. All my posts are equally great, so I probably hit that button by accident thinking that I was liking someone elses' post. But I did laugh. High five. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 It's Svec-Nasty. ORRRRRR -Natty like Natty Ice. Bitch. One day Natty Ice will join Ken-deezy on a Podcast. #restishistory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Victor 10,536 Posted March 4, 2014 Author Admin Share Posted March 4, 2014 VHLM Draft will indeed be on Sunday (best time for their GMs and Corco) so chances are season will start on Monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diamond_ace 3,106 Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 War, what is it good for? limiting the populations of the poor and lower middle class so that it's easier for the rich to stay on top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megster 63 Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 Not saying this is a bad idea, but aren't VHLM GMs supposed to do this anyway? I really only see this being a problem in cases like Coach D where you join in between the playoffs and the end of the off-season. when I was on recruitment crew we did this whole thing where we were like told all the VHLM GMs that it was their job to mentor their players and we wrote this whole long instruction thing on how to and there was even talk about whether or not we should give them 1 TPE a week for doing their job, but that obviously wasn't going to happen. So yeah, according to the recruitment crew post that was back on the smf forums you could lose your VHLM GM job if you weren't doing this but no one ever followed through and we got moved so the post doesn't exist anymore but yeah they are SUPPOSED to be doing this and it's a huge problem if they aren't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator frescoelmo 1,218 Posted March 5, 2014 Moderator Share Posted March 5, 2014 limiting the populations of the poor and lower middle class so that it's easier for the rich to stay on top Demographics and the decline in birth rates are already doing their parts in this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sterling 1,990 Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 Demographics and the decline in birth rates are already doing their parts in this. He said limiting, as in limiting them socially, not eliminating them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator frescoelmo 1,218 Posted March 5, 2014 Moderator Share Posted March 5, 2014 He said limiting, as in limiting them socially, not eliminating them. No I meant limiting, the average family worldwide is nearing the 2.1 tipping point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sterling 1,990 Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 No I meant limiting, the average family worldwide is nearing the 2.1 tipping point. You will have to explain yourself better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator frescoelmo 1,218 Posted March 5, 2014 Moderator Share Posted March 5, 2014 (edited) You will have to explain yourself better. The tipping point between an increasing and decreasing population is 2.1 children per family. Most industrialized nations are around or slightly above 2.1 (US is 2.3 I think)... Europe is starting to trend below it. Most third world nations are a good amount above it, but with the advancements in Africa and Asia it's been trending downward. Probably before the end of our generation we will see 2.1 as a worldwide average. Edited March 5, 2014 by frescoelmo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sterling 1,990 Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 The tipping point between an increasing and decreasing population is 2.1 children per family. Most industrialized nations are around or slightly above 2.1 (US is 2.3 I think)... Europe is starting to trend below it. Most third world nations are a good amount above it, but with the advancements in Africa and Asia it's been trending downward. Probably before the end of our generation we will see 2.1 as a worldwide average. So how does this have a causal relationship with the growing income gap in North America as you stated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator frescoelmo 1,218 Posted March 5, 2014 Moderator Share Posted March 5, 2014 So how does this have a causal relationship with the growing income gap in North America as you stated In regards to, "limiting the populations of the poor and lower middle class so that it's easier for the rich to stay on top"? Hmm... Population hits a growth ceiling, population levels off, population is therefore limited? I don't believe I ever stated such a thing about the growing income gap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Victor 10,536 Posted March 5, 2014 Author Admin Share Posted March 5, 2014 This is some deep shit. frescoelmo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator frescoelmo 1,218 Posted March 5, 2014 Moderator Share Posted March 5, 2014 This is some deep shit. Damnit I was just Victor'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sterling 1,990 Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 In regards to, "limiting the populations of the poor and lower middle class so that it's easier for the rich to stay on top"? Hmm... Population hits a growth ceiling, population levels off, population is therefore limited? I don't believe I ever stated such a thing about the growing income gap. Thats what he stated and you responded to. That still doesnt explain why people are getting poorer, which was his point and which you responded incorrectly to. He wasnt talking about the population going down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator frescoelmo 1,218 Posted March 5, 2014 Moderator Share Posted March 5, 2014 Thats what he stated and you responded to. That still doesnt explain why people are getting poorer, which was his point and which you responded incorrectly to. He wasnt talking about the population going down. It doesn't explain why people are getting poorer because I never addressed that statement, merely a reasoning for why the population increase is slowing down. There's nothing incorrect about how I responded, it just wasn't what you were expecting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sterling 1,990 Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 It doesn't explain why people are getting poorer because I never addressed that statement, merely a reasoning for why the population increase is slowing down. There's nothing incorrect about how I responded, it just wasn't what you were expecting. Again, he didnt say that so I am not sure why you responded that way. Just admit you read it wrong already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator frescoelmo 1,218 Posted March 5, 2014 Moderator Share Posted March 5, 2014 Again, he didnt say that so I am not sure why you responded that way. Just admit you read it wrong already He said war was the reason why populations were limited. I added in another reason why, strictly justifying his population claim. That is 100% what I addressed in my original statement, and nothing else. It makes complete sense how I responded. Is this that hard to understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sterling 1,990 Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 He said war was the reason why populations were limited. I added in another reason why, strictly justifying his population claim. That is 100% what I addressed in my original statement, and nothing else. It makes complete sense how I responded. Is this that hard to understand? For you it is, yes. He said war limits the low and lower middle class populations, keeping the rich on top. Where does he say anything about eliminating populations. No need to get touchy, but what you said didnt make sense. Look up the definition of limit and eliminate, son. They dont mean the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megster 63 Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 we don't have a popcorn smiley, we should invest in this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now