Victor

classic England

There are issues where it's probably best to skip the BOG and go straight to decision. I don't know what further discussion needs to take place outside this thread.

Virkkunen would roll in his grave.

Oh I thought it was the first one of next season. I hope it happens and United would be a bullshit excuse seeing as no one was harmed.

If we want second players to appear by the S51 draft, we have til S49 trade deadline to make this official. I think that's load of time. And it doesn't seem like anyone's really started trading S51 draft picks and in any case I don't think that matters. There wasn't 5 seasons heads up for expansion, it was announced before S30 for S31. I think the second issue you suggest can be dealt with by expansion but I don't know if it will be an issue especially if there's a staggered start and limits on how close the two players' draft seasons can be.

both s42 tho. naughty.

I already got 3 so I can die in peace. Draper is still an asshole and Higgins though.

I approve of Kiprusoff but that's probably not him.

yeah that sounds reasonable There should also be something which incentivises a staggered start. I don't think EVERYONE creating another player for S51 is a great idea and would work much better if it spread out over 4-5 seasons.

I see @Evans already got two players. Loving the Latvia pic. Also player to step up is definitely Sandro Clegane cuz he won't know what hit him. CLEGANEBOWL GET HYPE @JardyB10

I don't think there should be any cap. Whore the fuck out of both of them if you want. My condition would be that you can not have two players in the same draft year. That's a bit silly imo. Maybe even make it a mandatory gap of 2 seasons, but 1 might suffice. Otherwise, I actually don't see why we shouldn't implement this for S50. Or S51 I guess for timing purposes and because that's actually the start of the next half-century. If all the potential issues do end up being true, we can can it by S60.

The thing about rival GMs in locker rooms is that it's too late to sabotage anything as they will retire at the end of the season. The GM's own team will also always have completely separate interest to the one they're traded to - one's competing, the other isn't. So it wouldn't use your eaglesfan example or any other similar as proof that it will always go well - what you're proposing is a whole different step. Nonetheless, the idea has grown on me over the many times you've suggested it. I'm willing to accept it for the return of LRs at the bottom.

To (S48) C - P.J. Jackson (S48) LW - Sterling Archer To (S48) D - Sean Connery (S48) C - Rene Bergeron I accept. Had to get rid of Bergeron since Tyler is definitely not a first gen. Sterling Archer was too good to pass up although ADwyer drives a hard bargain and forced me to give up my prized possession in Sean Connery.

RJ Stafford's dating adventures will be missed. Apart from that I can't actually think of anything good that was left exclusive to that site. Except I guess people's member numbers for Builder articles.

Damn @Nobody is a cheat

Still ridiculous that this is Arsenal's best finish since 2005. Fucking Spurs are useless.

I mean judging by the S46 draft, I dunno why anyone else would think they'd get you.... except Seattle but they weren't exactly known for their communication back then.

god damn he actually is losing it with Wingate just retire now Cowboy, no point playing this season.

Where the hell did this made up stat come from? It's OK, Karnage can cry next to Lars Berger, who also hit people, scored GWGs, and was never considered for MVP. Also had more TPE than anyone else. Pretty much twins if you ignore the cups.

Yeah, scary stuff. Going to be a scheduling nightmare now though with the FA Cup next Saturday and then Euros soon after.

also seems like we have something in common to discuss in Quebec

Still higher (lower? better? I dunno) odds on Leicester getting relegated next season than winning again lol.

Overhauling the whole attribute and update scale system just so we can get two stats which according to some SHLers are questionable anyway? That seems like a reasonable solution. Also, I suspect v2 caters to teams with 4 lines which is why it doesn't work here.