Gonna be a hard no from me as well. Like mentioned above, it'd be a "set and forget" type role where there's no real drive to stay active. If you're coaching a winning team, that's not necessarily on you, it's moreso credited to the GM for lines and rosters. With players, you can upgrade certain areas and watch your players progress through their career and watch them increase in points. IMO there's just no drive for it. A coach sounds like a good idea but it going against the cap and counting as a roster spot isn't enticing. Because as a GM, why would I want to tell a prospect they aren't gonna play because a coach took their spot. Plus 15 seasons? That's gonna handicap a team hardcore, and I feel like people would get bored of it after maybe 3. Sorry, sounds like a good idea but I really hope this isn't implemented