Banackock

I know the feeling. It hurts. But you’re not alone. Have you felt this season you’ve been violated by Toronto and the dirty, dirty scumbag program known as STHS? It’s one letter away from being backwards SHITS. Call today and nobody will give a damn. 1-800-555-STHS

Poor Pepper

Hi Toronto

Alright. Someone call 1-9-9. Clear domestic abuse here. Calgary needs to be locked up for throwing Riga around.

I chalk this one up to Vancouver scoring more than zero. That is the root cause here I think. Will do extensive scientific research and release results in 2029.

EDMONTON YES

Go Moscow!

Yeah. Not bragging but 8-2-0 last 10 I think. I appreciate your consistency buddy. I’ll start dishing it out again once I put my head back on right

Don’t brag.

Worked well, line changes we did.

Better tell Satan to get his snow pants on. Hell is freezing up!

There you go! Should of win both. GG DCD.

Wow.. 16 SOG. DCD, GG. You deserved this one.

But with that said... I’m NEVER against these ideas. I just feel like it’s a bigger system than it seems and would take a lot of work and the care and attention wouldn’t quite be there from those that it would need to be.

So basically AGM’s just more buffed? I think I brought this idea or something close to it up once upon a time and it got shut down. Looking/thinking back, I see why: I feel like there’s too much maintenance, work etc for very little reward to the entire community and it effects a small group of players. I just don’t see it as something the league needs or something that would strongly benefit the league and would be more of a pain in the ass/burn out thing than anything else. Similar to my idea of VHL teams etc having owners, making money matter more and having values on VHL organizations. Similar to like Franchise mode on NHL... the idea sounds sweet and would probably be amazing fun, but when you’re weighing every side, is the work worth what’s being offered? For that idea, probably not. It might add lots for some, and some for some, but for most it may be whatever and for the league as a whole and for those who run it, it’ll just be more work than a good thing. Awesome stuff though man on these suggestions. I love seeing this stuff and being part of good conversations to make the league a better place! @studentized

I actually like this idea. I don’t know how much but SHL does it and it’s whatever. Everyone is freaking out right now about inflation and update scale in the BoG or whatever... Is this not an extremely easy answer? 80-90 was always a good range I think on SHL do it would be a good way to get rid of a nice little chunk of TPE. My only issue with it would be regression but I think with everyone in the same level, we’d essentially have fairness across the board. Just depends how people build and save. Thank you @studentized for the suggestion and putting in effort bettering the league. Sometimes some members in the BoG get way too ahead of themselves and whenever things arise, we got back to what we know and typically what we know is a whole system or picture. This is a great example of looking within the picture and finding ways to make it even better without major overhaul. @BOG

Awesome

@solas I’m gonna make multis and have you make me sigs for all em.

Lol okay. I honestly don’t get it. 6-0 W to a team that rightfully could kick our ass and has an epic roster... 2-0 L to the shittiest team roster wise in the league and we never beat them. Next season I’m trading all my shit for inactive 200 TPE players and just making sure my average is higher because STHS is garbage. Beketov rolling dice to determine games would be more reasonable at this point. GG Moscow. Apologies for STHS and its meth addiction.

better off just saying no comment. What a joke.