hedgehog337

I never was active in LR unless it's my team btw.

That's why @RomanesEuntDomus retired his player, so much disrespek on his name.

He just took advantage of Kesler tbh.

I know, right? A lot's of RIG firsts are saying the same.

offers: S56: 1,75M Like I said, let's send Lahey out with the ring. @Cuffy

I like orange. The other colors can go straight to hell, especially blue.

Player Name: Fredinamijs Krīgars VHL Team: Riga Reign Cash you have: 4,5M [with S56 contract] Purchase Name: Double Award Prediction Cost of Purchase: 2,5M Cash Left: 2M

I'll curse Fujimoto then.

4 TPE goes to Petenis

He was playing in Riga in a S51 cup run.

As always, I'm not doing an intro because I'm here to name the captains, not to write another essay. The S56 Riga Reign Captains: C - Markus King @Kendrick A - Essian Ravenwing @der meister A - Phil Shankly @Phil I think all three named captains will be active on boards and LR and they will have a good chance to take a Grimm trophy. Don't forget to congratulate them!

evrydayimjoking? I see.

@evrydayimbyfuglien might be kinda semi-active though.

I'm not saying you lost in the last trade. I was just saying I brought a younger and better player/goalie to my team in exchange of an aging defenceman. And goalie is more important position too.

*My early days with the Riga Reign team* I don't know if @Tagger reads my mind, but my today's article is about the trade that happened back in the S53 off-season, so thanks him for the updating the trade tracker. This trade could've been the most controversial in that off-season, but the deal between Stockholm and Seattle turned the attention away from my trade. What happened? @Banackock had fun times with his team during S50-53 period when he was drafting team's future and competing. But all good things have to come to an end, especially when players suddenly are retiring from the VHL league and some members are becoming GM's. And it was no surprise when he decided to start from the scratch. First of all, he sent his Wolf and Pietro Maximoff to Stockholm which ended in a controversy between a couple of memebers. 30 minutes later, he made another deal: I won't be wrong if I'll will name that a weirdest trade in the S53 off-season. So here it is: To (S50) D - Guntis Petenis To S54 RIG 1st So what was that? First of all, I took the Riga Reign team in the mid-S53 who was in rebuilding mode. So it would've made sense to keep the 4th pick. Instead, I just gave up the 4th pick for...470-480 TPE defenseman who had one season left before regression. Actually these talks about this trade were happening way before that off-season - Banackock revealed his selling plans somewhere after Bogdan Podarok's unexpected retirement so he was offering Petenis for that 4th pick. Somehow, but I agreed for that. My plan actually was to grab Petenis and sell him for even higher pick, likely to Helsinki. Looking back to this trade, I realize it was a silly idea and @Higgins showed exactly why I was wrong by his simple ''No thanks'' reply. Also: Afterparty. I will explain why I put the Frank's quote, but first let's see what Seattle did with fourth pick. 4. SEATTLE BEARS (from Riga): Aleksei Federov, 211 TPE Smart move as Banackock was confident in himself and he was sure he won't go inactive and step down soon anytime soon, so he took his own defenseman. Aleksei Fedorov still plays for the Bears so there's nothing more to talk about. As for Riga: Guntis Petenis managed to somehow win the Labatte, Slobodzian and Campble awards in same season and that was a good part. But the trade still looked weird as these awards only boosted my ego, not the team's future. So it was obvious I needed to make a somewhat proper rebuild and that resulted in this trade (S54 off-season): To S56 QUE 1st To (S50) D - Guntis Petenis Frank was right, the late first round pick in a mediocre draft is worse than a lottery pick in a good draft. So it seemed like I completily lost in the previous trade, but not that fast folks! I didn't even save that pick. Instead, the VHL saw this trade (S55 off-season): To (S54) G - Marcus King To S56 QUE 1st S56 SEA 2nd I decided to make a bold move and bring @Kendrick to Riga as I didn't want to wait for too long before making a push. We can say that I was lucky to get away with this cheap price just because @punkhippie overvalued the S56 draft and he's not fond of Kendrick himself, but it is what it is. Somehow I turned the negative into positive that is helping to make a playoff push. Also, that S56 QUE 1st pick turned into an inactive Aeschylus Jigglejawns CXXXVIII. Who won? It's hard to say which team had more profits from that trade. It depends actually on Kendrick now: *If he re-signs with Riga - I take a slight win here as I have a strong goalie for multiple seasons, but Seattle doesn't loses here either; *If he doesn't re-signs with Riga - Banackock takes a slight win as he still has a strong defenceman to make a strong contender team in the future. So we will see what happenes in the next off-season, but so far nobody lost from this trade. That's it and I'm out. 6 TPE goes to Krīgars

Meanwhile, Guntis Petenis is crying somewhere in the world. He never was a S50 big

You have no Owens either so you lose anyway.

The only thing will do is losing players, starting from Sami Zayn now. where they gonna lose to Riga.

Oh right, already forgot about that smh. Maybe he wasn't happy with the direction of team and then the trade happened. I don't exactly know what happened though.

I think only @Kendrick probably would've signed with CAL. I think Robbie (Axelberry) had some issues with Kesler(?), Ironside to TOR in any cases. King? Maybe. But that's a ''what if'' thing, so idk.

@Smarch are these TPE claimable on both players?

The Riot reunion is real.

offers: S56: 1,5M @mpclardy Let's do it!