boubabi

I mean, it looked like a hard no to me but hey cant blame bushito, thats a good trade

What the

that's no gud

aye a win

Because it doesnt fix the problem lmao

That's part of being in a conference, you don't play the same team. For most of the time I was here, the EU was far superior in depth then NA. I think this is a particular case. Anyhow, our current format doesn't prevent Riga putting 7 goals on toronto every games

I will try to explain my thought process behind it. Having a 10 teams league, there's a pretty clear cut on who's competing and who's not. Most often then not, the 3rd team in each conference is just a ''place holder'' who seems to only favor personal stats. The first team in each conference having that sort of ''bye'' has not advantage whatsover. (it isn't proven to help the player's performance behind rested or not) and they will, anyway, play against a top team at second round. That bye week, in my mind, needs to be removed. Without having that sort of competition, the regular season as little to no meaning. Finishing top of your conference gives you no advantage really, as you already have a fair idea on who you are playing in the second round. In the end, the regular season is purely for personal stats and team success comes second, which is obviously, not optimal for the league's interest. So if we try to focus more on the team success instead of going full offense during regular season, I think reducing the number of team going into the playoffs is necessary. That's why I would reduce it to 4 teams However, we had some particular season where we had a bunch of competing team and maybe cutting it to 4 would be unfair, so that's why we could spice it up a bit. The 4th and 5th seed would play a wildcard game/serie to determine who's playing against the top seed. My orginal idea was to make it 1 game only, but considering STHS is pretty bullshit at time (most of the time lets be honest) 1 game could be very, very risky. The middle ground would be a best of 3, which kinda goes against my thought of removing the ''bye'' round, but I think it's a decent compromise. Team success wise, I think we now have a reason to finish 1st in the ranking, cause it will ensure you to play against the weakest seed, which benefits your team for sure. There's more to it, but I think that was the main idea behind it. Oh yeah, all the team out of the playoffs (don't know if we should add the losing team of the wildcard serie) would be eligible for the loto with some maybe adjusted rating, which is kinda nice as well trade pick value wise.

I guess my opinion is clear on that subject

ayayaille

fucking hell, let more goals plz

shiny week

ALWAYS ABOUT YOURSELF EUH ??????

I'm sure its possible

Motherfucker Sharpe beats up Franchise Cornerstone at 9:24 of 2nd period fuckoff @JardyB10

consistent SCRUB amirite

I kinda laugh

Turris asked for 7M in Ottawa for 6 years. Melnyk wasnt ready to commit himself for 6 years at that price. Some say Turris took a friendly cap deal in Nashville. I think it was Pierre Lebrun but I'm not sure.

DOrion was rdy to give him what he wanted, but not the team owner, who's famously cheap

he's worth 0.7 pts per game with a 2 way game Not saying he's ''ryan o'reilly'' quality, but they have comparable numbers

looking forward to see duchene in gatineau after 3am

Yeah Turris was a good 2 way center. I feel like Brassard and Turris were both 2 excellents 2nd line center and Duchene gives that top spot a little bit more punch. Dunno how Boucher will like the individual though

3 pts for Krigars I think it's honest to say that its a loss for the whole vhl right here

Apollo Skye (QUE), 14 saves from 15 shots - (0.933), W, 29-10-6, 60:00 minutes Astrid Moon (HSK), 13 saves from 15 shots - (0.867), L, 26-14-1, 60:00 minutes4 what the fuck is this we want goals, stop it (or I should say, don't stop it) amirite