Will

Be advised of the new salary thresholds for traded players in the VHL. These numbers are proportionally identical to the old thresholds, just updated to fit a 12-team schedule. The team trading for a player is required to pay the percentage corresponding to the current game number: 100% - off-season - Game 65 85% - Game 66 - 160 70% - Game 161 - 260 60% - Game 261 - ~325 (75% of the season) @VHL GM

I mean if I'm being completely honest my opinion would be that the decision to jump through hoops to stay under the TPE limit is on them. I do understand where you're coming from, but I've also long thought it was very overly generous of the league to allow people to claim achievement tracker more than once so in that sense I don't feel that bad. Maybe something in the middle could be worked out but I don't think they should qualify for the full, automatic 20 TPE.

I wouldn't think, no. Not the official word but anyone that has received achievement tracker points should not be eligible for the graduation bonus IMO.

K

Y u always gotta point out my flaws brah

Sorry fam bad timing for my vacation ?

Yep we'll need to update the queries for them. I asked the other admins if it should be public back when designing it. I thought it would be kind of cool thing to spark discussion but most others thought it should stay private.

This one is definitely not intentional - there were some changes to how positions were handled so I'm guessing that just needs to be updated. This one was actually a decision I made. As I added the all-time stats and whatnot I found that team pages were getting to large and current season stats were the logical thing to go given the Team Scoring page exists.

@DougForsyth and @Brickwall perma banned for being DougF.

came here expecting face reveal

Rammer can't wait for @Higgins to blow a couple thousand on packs

Believe STHS requires a 3 letter abbreviation and we'll run into some issues if STHS abbreviation doesn't match Portal abbreviation.

im not saying there's a better alternative but god i hate that abbreviation DCD

That's what I was thinking too. I don't see why they shouldn't be able to do basic conditions, we have two other key rules that really protect against any issues IMO - the draft pick trading rule and the 'compromising the integrity of a team/league' rule.

I'm kind of confused on the legality of conditions tbqh - I know the rule book says "Future conditions of ANY kind are not allowed to be dealt" but (and I don't know this for sure i haven't looked) I feel like some have been allowed? I would assume any condition would not be enforceable by the league given the rule book but have we kind of allowed gentleman's agreements between GMs to take place, assuming they don't violate other rules?

to me the issue is less so the conditional aspect, more so that it appears the S70 pick is skirting the draft pick rules.

@Devise good news, this behaved weirdly only because the offer was made before the last portal update. Didn't realize but in hindsight it makes sense it wouldnt work.

No worries there I can only fix what I know about - that is very strange. I should be able to look at this tonight.

Nope you didn't jump the gun, it's been properly applied to S68 on the portal this is just an issue with the numbering I'm the forum post.

Indeed it should! Thanks.

rather that than be a r/the_donald moderator

@STZ idk man at least one of those things is questionable

Higgins is literally a mining legend Guy can go for days straight