Jump to content

Acydburn

Commissioner
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,637

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Acydburn

    (S85) G - Matt Murdock, TPE: 80

    in Create A Player

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Arce said:

    Pumped for your new player's journey Acyd!

     

    You know me, we aren't a playoff contender as we have been re-tooling this year and just sold the farm. But we will give you the ice time and starts for the rest of the season. If you would rather ride with a serious Founder's Cup competing team, I do not blame you! But if you are interested in grabbing life by the horns, just reply with #HornsUp

    I'm not saying that.. send me the contract.

    VHLM Waiver Improvement Proposal

    in Archive

    Posted

    To add to that because I think I didn't convey my perspective correctly.

     

    I was speaking from a user experience perspective of if you say I want to join San Diego out of the list. I get the PM and sign the contract. That looks great to me and everything is in order. I am on a team, join the LR and all is fine and dandy and it's very streamlined. From a users perspective it's seamless and I chose where I'm going. The GM is still going to reach out to me as well as anyone else players, agm, whoever if I do join the LR. 

     

    Now the concern is that they'll sign with a team be on the roster and never come back which is valid. To combat this, there should be an approval from the GM to actually add said player to the roster. It may seem like six of one half a dozen of the other, but it's not. 

     

    The process protects the GM if they never hear from the user/the user never comes back. 

    It also helps the user/player as the process was seamless and improved their experience. They now get to be in the LR/do tasks/learn about the league. The first 5 minutes or however long a user is on the site is where we have to grab them and keep them. Having them accept an offer and then hear back, okay your GM will reach out to you at some point may turn them away. Having them accept that first contract is a pretty big deal and can get someone hooked if it's done correctly. 

     

    I'll admit its a very small difference but it might be the difference between 5 users sticking around.

     

     

    VHLM Waiver Improvement Proposal

    in Archive

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, Spartan said:

    I agree Prime Directive would cover most of my issue, and we'd definitely need to have some sort of process in place to monitor players joining teams and not being signed. Maybe once Dil gets deeper into the development, we can have an idea of how the process looks on the portal and how it could be monitored by commissioners. I just really don't want to see not signing players for competitive reasons behind the farce of say an uncommunicative member, or some weird excuse that I can't even think of right now lol.

     

    The process will look a lot different because it's not just "offer in a thread to someone you haven't even spoken to yet," but rather a GM will get to see how the user engages with the team or in the LR before signing them. There could definitely be valid reasons for not signing players under this new process.

     

    That reminds me, we should probably have mods work with GM's to try and secure their servers a bit, especially if we're leaving team LR invites on a public site. Can follow up on it down the line though.

     

    I may have missed a step in the process. I was going off of Gustav's original message. Why wouldn't the GM want to sign the user? Are we allowing them to apply to multiple teams at once? I figured it was:

    See what teams are available with the information of 

    • Important info to display for each team would include rank, projected line placement (i.e. the portal will say "3rd line" or "2nd pairing" based on the number of active players at that position on that team), current playoff/non-playoff status, and a button to click which brings up a short message from the GM, editable from that team's "manage team" page, about the team and its plans (give this a character limit)

    Then it would:

    • Once a team is selected to be joined, @VHL Bot or something creates a forum message between the player and the GM, and drops in a link to that team's Discord server (the GM can also provide one with the general message in Manage Team). 

    So are we allowing a player to select multiple teams? I feel like that could be confusing for a user. As it stands a few new users think they're signing up for multiple teams. 

     

    My opinion and it might be vetoed is you allow them to see all the information and when they select a team you just have a confirm "Are you sure you want to sign with this team? Once signed you can only be traded to another team. This can not be undone".

     

    1 team per user and then when it hits a certain number of a position it doesn't allow a user of that position to join said team. Which others have said/discussed.

    Career Point Task Revisit

    in Archive

    Posted

    5 hours ago, fishy said:

    i was thinking about why i don't do career tasks and it's 100% because i don't want to write them. thoughts on incorporating other media options? have people make a video, record a news cast, etc 

     

    I mean, could be a cool concept for a veteran presence to be like a 30 for 30 or a quick  prospect scouting report video for. Not sure how many would take the time/effort for that when a 400 word article would take less time to complete. 

     

    2 hours ago, Spartan said:

    What would be the guidelines/requirements for these tasks?

     

    I feel like 400 words with prompts and talking points isn't overly difficult to do, especially for 5 uncapped TPE. I don't know how low the requirements of an alternative media option would have to be in order to make it a proportional level of effort. 

     

     

    Overall for this thread, though, I don't feel like the options we have on the board are remotely reflective of the time spent on this topic. They're minor QoL changes at best and we haven't really impacted anyone's motivation to be completing these tasks outside hoping the topic edits and timeline tweaks make them more specific to what they are. If we want to quietly roll out the tweaks that's fine, but this can't be sold as the Career Task overhaul people were asking for. I'll admit I've checked out on this topic and I'm struggling to come up with more ideas.

     

    At this point, they seem easy enough at 400 words. I think if folks aren't happy, we either decrease the number of tasks and increase the word count like Fishy was saying or we increase the number of tasks and decrease the requirements/word counts. Seems to be the options as I don't think people would be comfortable speaking or videoing themselves as the only way to get a task done. 

     

     

    VHLM Waiver Improvement Proposal

    in Archive

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Spartan said:

    I'm a bit torn, since while this new process makes getting people onto teams a lot easier, we still have a layer in there where the GM has to send the player a contract. I don't know to what degree that could be abused by M GM's, and it's a bit pessimistic of me to even bring it up. I don't think any of the current GM's would make up a reason to not sign a player to continue running an optimal, competitive roster, but I feel like we should have a mitigating mechanism to ensure that it's not possible.

     

    Whether that means keeping the double shift rule or requiring GM's to get permission from M Commissioners to not be signing a player that requested to sign with their team, that'll have to be decided. 

    Couldn't that be considered a part of:

     

     - VHLM Prime Directive

     

    The VHLM is primarily a development league. Its objective is to be a welcoming and engaging environment for new players, in the hopes that they remain active and eventually graduate from the VHLM. General Managers and their assistants are expected to make offers to new players until their team is considered full. They are also expected to release inactive players from their rosters.

     

    Failure to comply with the VHLM Prime Directive may result in any of the following punishment, depending on the severity of the infraction.

    1. A warning, with grace extended to allow the GM to re-submit lines and carry on.
    2. Forced removal of the inactive player(s).
    3. Loss of draft picks and/or free agency signing rights (not waivers).
    4. Dismissal from the role of VHLM GM.

    Would just have to make it clear what a full roster is. Other than that, this rule would allow for punishment if a GM/AGM is not abiding by it. Not sure how far into development it is, but couldn't we institute a check of, player applied to team A but was not signed? Could have a screen for it or a PM/email that goes out once a week. I can help with the code if need be. 

     

    Allow Recreates to Opt Into the VHLE

    in Archive

    Posted

    Working off what Spartan said, I think 160 is fine and the reality is that not recreate is going to want to skip the M anyways. It's just an option for some if they want it. I think last season we had 6 out of 9 that we asked who wanted to go up. 

     

    Like Bek is saying and I agreed. It doesn't make any sense to gut the M, It exists for a reason and was never an option or thought. It would be nice to give those who "qualify" the option if they choose. 

    State of the BOG

    in Archive

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Spartan said:

    This feels a little like kneecapping the BoG, since its preventing people who could be contributing from contributing. I think we as individuals should be more aware of whether we are contributing or not, and step back from the role if needed. I think everyone in here is responsible enough that they could self-diagnose signs of burnout, but I'll admit that I would worry of not being allowed back if I was to ask for a break from BoG duties. Maybe if we can sort of clarify more tolerance and flexibility on that front, to allow people to step back and rejoin when they're ready, individuals would be better prepared to handle burnout from this role.

     

    I like limited contracts not specifically to motivate them, but moreso to offer trial periods to see how they perform and to know if the position is right for them. I feel like term limits of being a commissioner would have the same concerns as a limited term BoG Head where the topics discussed and worked on would be based off the user's agenda, compounded by the knowledge that there is a time limit to when those ideas can be pushed

     

    Neat, thanks 😅. I admittedly am interesting in commissioning(?), but I would prefer to start at the E or M level first before taking on a much higher level role. I still think I could be a Blue now and handle the general responsibilities and do a decent job, as I'm pretty active on a daily basis and have handled numerous jobs without issue. I still feel like I need to prove myself more from an administrative perspective before that though and gain more trust, but I'd be happy to interview or discuss the position further if there's interest from Blues.

    I mean I'm all for fresh blood and limits on BOG may not be the worst thing in the world.

     

    I would raise a concern on term limits for blues, reds, greens as the job takes a specific person and turnover can have a negative effect on the respective leagues. I will add that if this is the consensus though then I'll gladly abide by it. 

     

    As for you Mr. @Spartanon being a blue/red/green general. We've had many conversations about you doing so. Don't sell yourself short ;)  

    State of the BOG

    in Archive

    Posted

    5 hours ago, Beketov said:

    That sounds exactly like how we used to run the award committee; I’ve learned from experience that you run out of qualified candidates incredibly quickly. Like within 5 seasons we’d be scraping the bottom of the barrel.

     

    We’re looking into it. If nothing else Josh and I agree that the blue team has historically worked best with 2 critical thinkers and a visionary. That use to be me and Quik on one side then Beav on the other, then Al replaced Beav, then Josh replaced Quik. Point is we’re both thinkers, not visionaries. 
     

    We have been picking our own for a bit now but honestly when I became blue it’s because I volunteered in this very forum and said hey, I think I can do that. So maybe we try that again as well, it worked once. Anyone want to step up to the plate? I’m not saying it’s like “first one to volunteer gets it” but at least it gives us some ideas.

    I wouldn't hate the idea of becoming of a blue. I've been a VHLM Commie, VHLE Commie, so the progression would make sense. As far as offsetting the thinker/visionary I think I can put a foot in both and wear a few different hats. Can discuss it more with you and Josh if you wanted. 

     

    I know it's not a first one to volunteer or anything. Just saying I would throw my hat in the ring. 

    Mack Attack May

    in VHL.com Articles

    Posted

    4 hours ago, pugsood said:

    The Sun Gazzette continues its monthly coverage and update of Northern Virginia native and now former SBA basketball player Alvin Mack, as he continues to be eligible in the VHL, despite not having entertained any overtures by the league and its general managers to date. Our beat reporter Jordan Smith caught up with Mack on May 1st, in Bryson City, North Carolina.

     

    Smith: Same question, different month - any plans on pursuing hockey?

    Mack: Well, given we're having this conversation in the smack dab of the VHL and at my vacation home in Bryson City, I'd say the chances are pretty slim, wouldn't you? In all seriousness, I don't think I've got what it takes to lace up the skates right now and give it a whirl. I'm focused on enjoying some peace and serenity up here, and watching Steve Lattimer put together a great show in the SBA. Thank goodness for the All-SBA pass.

     

    Smith: Speaking of Bryson City, why did you choose to have a vacation home here?

    Mack: My girlfriend used to work not too far from here, closer to Asheville. She turned me onto the area, it's really peaceful even if it's a hike from the DC area. The drive is beautiful going through rural Virginia, down through a bit of Tennessee, and then hitting the mountains of North Carolina. As you can see, even though I'm no outdoorsman and have no competence as a handyman, I'll pay for a view, and this place certainly has all of that and then some.

     

    Smith: So you subscribe to All-SBA pass? What and who are you watching, normally?

    Mack: Well, of course, Steve. I don't miss a game. I really wish they'd use him more as a fulcrum at the high post, he has elite passing skills and reminds me of Nikola Jokic in terms of using the angles. He's already got the athleticism to finish tough plays around the basket. I love watching Wally Herman play. He's taken a huge leap and I don't think you'll find two guys who play and work as hard as him and Lattimer. Have you ever seen them take a play off? I haven't seen it from either of them. I've watched Kunta play too. I'm honestly jealous and talking to Steve, think he is too. Not that often you get to be a primary scorer for a title-contending team. I know I had to wait my turn to start contributing to the box score even though I was doing well with 20-28 minutes a game my first few seasons. But I compare my Mexico City experience to what Kunta has in Miami...he struck gold. You also can't not watch the Ravens, just to see if they'll lose.

     

    Smith: Last time we met, you were at the Intercollegiate Athletics Forum talking about Name, Image & Likeness. Before today's conversation, you were at the Collegiate Sports Summit. What gives?

    Mack: Someone has it in their head that I'm a voice of reason in the new world and wild west of college athletics. So if I can help the NCAA, the athletic directors, and the 3rd parties who are going guns blazing into the NIL era be a little bit more responsible about how this whole thing plays out, then I'll certainly take the time to do that. 
     
    Smith: Post-All Star Weekend, any SBA predictions?

    Mack: Well, first, I hate the all star weekend. I think I made it once during my time? It's ridiculously stupid how they pick players. In terms of the 2nd half of the season and the playoffs, I still think Charlotte is going to figure out a way to win it all. It seems wide open, though. Hopefully Coach Bobby puts in the time to do it, sometimes I think he gets outworked on the Xs and O's but he's one of the few guys lately to have won it all, and I know Steve has enjoyed playing for him mostly. So I'll stick with my pick.

    This wraps up the May edition with Alvin Mack. 

    giphy.gif

×
×
  • Create New...