hedgehog337

this name

Calgary Wranglers 2:4 Seattle Bears

232 New York Americans @ Riga Reign 233 Calgary Wranglers @ Seattle Bears 234 Quebec City Meute @ Helsinki Titans 235 Toronto Legion @ HC Davos Dynamo

They drew Andorra 0-0 two times (one of the was today). Latvia football team

So I've heard I can earn 3 TPE for this quote. This is very nice. And I really have something to write about since Randoms made the Europe team. That's very nice. I'm glad a GM didn't see his build. Nevertheless, he perfromed at a decent level. In 8 games, he posted 5 points with 14 hits. The interesting part is he is far from being a team's leader in hits. But he wasn't getting much ice time so he's fine. And he's definitely fine for a 24th pick. The team leader in points was Paolo Nano by the way. He was a part of Riga for the half of season and then got traded to Helsinki to not holding him as the 5th def with only 10 minutes per game. We're seeing that he's can become a decent defenceman at least. He also managed to post 10 hits in a semi-final game. Somehow, he turns out in a fine power forward. Can't wait to see him in Quebec...if he won't be traded which I think is going to happen following this season cause their offense sucks and Randoms won't help them with that. So we were fine, but that Pepper dude ruined it so this is the last time I'm mentioning this tournament and maybe until my next player comes out. If there would be no bonus TPE for next WJC events obviosuly. 2+1 TPE to Kallis

*confused me* I already claimed a welfare TPE for Randoms and I think this was a wrong move. Once again, I sitting here with no idea what to write about. Well, this is a mid-season. However, commishes and BoG gave me an idea. I found out (from some source, not gonna name it) that they were about to get rid of GM players! An interesting change, isn't it? Since I'm not in BoG and can't voice my opinion there, I'll do it right here. I was kinda confused when I saw this info. This could've been a bold change. For decades, we used to think that a GM should have his player only in his team. And he definitely should have a player, having no player in his GM'ed team is weird and doesn't seem right. To be honest, I'm one of these guys who's thinking like that. And now I'm seeing this info...scratching my head cause this is caught me off guard a bit. Getting rid of GM players also means a team is going to lose this player either via trade or retirement. This makes that idea even more bold. But my thoughts about this change that won't happen? (I assume they've decided to shelve it). I'm glad this is not going to happen. Or just negative. Let's see positives and negatives about this change. More fun in this off-season. Especially for the non-GM players who would be interested to see more unexpected moves from GM's. The landscape of this league also may change, which is fun. More locker rooms. Some of GM's are only holding their player(s) in their team. With this change, they would discover more locker rooms which could make their time in this league more fun instead of sitting in one LR all the time. And to be honest, these all positives I could find in this idea. However, I also have some...more negatives than good. Losing a player? This is bullshit. Especially for GM's who have a goalie. So you definitely know I'm going to be against this change. I mean, Kallis is not that good, but he's still a goalie. Sabotaging a player to not help his rivals. A GM may trade his guy to other team and immediately stop updating because he doesn't wants to help that other team. And maybe he even gonna retire after a season. I assume we're better than that, but I just can't to not point this out. Losing a motivation to create a player. I mean, why even creating a player if he's going to your rival anyways. That's gonna suck for GM's who hates to lose. It's safer with his own player, not other GM's guy. Enough said. To be honest, negatives outweighs the positives by a wide margin. And I'm being biased by this cause I'm not inerested to lose a goalie. And while I could find a solution to this via trade, but I can't control other user and his plans on his player. Maybe he wants to retire his player in 1-2 seasons? And not even because he doesn't likes my team, just because he wants to make a fresh start. It's safer with my own player, knowing that only I'm in charge in this player not someone else. Anyways, as I said earlier this change will likely be shelved and I assume it's not gonna happen. So that's just a 500 word article, thanks for reading. 6 TPE goes to Kallis.

@Smarch has something to tell about def of the year award.

@ShawnGlade @Enorama come here and see this game

Seattle Bears though

150 Saskatoon Wild @ Halifax 21st 151 Yukon Rush @ Oslo Storm 152 Las Vegas Aces @ Ottawa Lynx 153 Yukon Rush @ Saskatoon Wild

150 Saskatoon Wild 2:1 Halifax 21st

5 to Randoms

He's just mad cause Aamo is about to have better stats.

can't say it performed better in other game vs CAL as a starter

5 to Randoms

sim is shit then. A CPU goalie was supposed to start in that game, not here.

RIG G wasn't supposed to be a starter here @Will

How long Kallis will suck? Do you play or watch chess? Did you know the World Chess Championship just started in London? Can the UK hockey team to stay in elite after next year WC? Do you like this fight for the # spot? 4 points separates us from Quebec now.

he's inactive. D - Ryan Kastelic @Enorama

@Jubo07 DIDN'T AGREE WITH HIS GM'S DECISION! SCANDAL IN HELSINKI OTW!!!

144 Seattle Bears @ Quebec City Meute 145 Toronto Legion @ New York Americans 146 Riga Reign @ Calgary Wranglers 147 HC Davos Dynamo @ Helsinki Titans

146 Riga Reign 3:2 Calgary Wranglers

Giving @leafsman more chances in Helsinki where he can shine more bright than gettin 10 minutes in Riga. Thanks for not giving up despite being a third round prospect and good luck with the Titans!

107 Halifax 21st 6:3 Ottawa Lynx