Jump to content

scoop

Members
  • Posts

    8,308
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    40

Everything posted by scoop

  1. It's not a matter of Sean Connery, it's a matter of Shayne Gow.
  2. And if you want me to get technical, these players cannot be signed for $7,000,000 therefore the contracts Higgins has offered are invalid.
  3. And you can't just choose to ignore the rulebook because "24 hours is close enough"
  4. They aren't RFAs because they weren't offered contracts by the teams that drafted them. They could make $4,000,000 if they were in the VHL, but yeah, $3,000,000 is the most they can make in the VHLM. My issue is that Higgins first opted to try to just sign them all in the Helsinki contracts thread. I guess I also find there to be a bit of a flaw in that he can just offer them the max and no other team could contend with it. Not that I think any other team would've. Just kind of fed up with his antics going back to last season and in the thread discussing the Helsinki punishment.
  5. bears titans reign wranglers
  6. scoop

    QUE/NYA ; VOID

    To be fair, Doughty's position change was not posted in the position change forum.
  7. He cannot be sent down until Davos is cap compliant. @JardyB10 please put him back on Davos @Higgins please remove him from Saskatoon
  8. Ahh, I see. I assume the same is true with Balders, because neither of them have a VHLM team.
  9. Still under contract with Calgary..
  10. Balders is still under contract with the Bears..
  11. scoop

    QUE/NYA ; VOID

    @Mr. Power before you go and accept this, I should point out that the finance sheet listing him as a defenseman is incorrect. Doughty is in fact a forward and will remain as such, as he has already changed positions once in his career. Perhaps you know this, though. Should I start packing my bags?
  12. If we had performed well against Davos and Quebec we would've scored more than five goals over four games against those trash teams.
  13. Why do you keep saying this shit as if the goalies are not part of the game? "Oh we lost because their goalies played better so it's not a real loss!"
  14. Dunno wtf you're talking about this is our third loss. Just because the other two were against teams that we "should've" beat doesn't mean that they weren't real.
  15. Because you like to make a joke of finances, that's why.
  16. Good effort team. I failed you all
  17. http://www3.zippyshare.com/v/I1K1UhxU/file.html I talk about some things. A little bit of Aidan Shaw Trophy trivia, a couple ideas that have had minor discussion recently, and the odd beginning to this season. Music: Dire Straits - Romeo and Juliet // The Killers - Romeo and Juliet f0r maxw3ll (for Dec 5-11 week because I'm dumb and already did a PT this wee loll)
  18. He's gonna be sending him down to the VHLM, but also I'm not going to recognize this signing. For anyone curious, what Higgins is doing here is this: offering the max so no team can match him; and then he's going to send them down. I'm not going to waste my time putting it into finances. If it matters down the road, you can contest it then and I'll argue against you, but you'll probably win the case then. Until then, I'm just going to ignore these signings.
  19. And in line with my previous post (and I mean this mostly in a joking manner, but it's hard to deny there is some truth to it) - that idea would have been proven true even if you had been voted in during one of the seasons later in your GM tenure.
  20. Oddly enough, I think your case would've been better and more supported had you not set the record for longest tenure as GM.
×
×
  • Create New...