QUE/STO ; S48 off-season

[Kesler 1,515]

Quebec Sends:

11th overall selection

 

Stockholm Sends:

S51 STO 3rd

 

accept.

[jack 498]

accept

[eaglesfan036 4,635]

wtf

[eaglesfan036 4,635]

this should be voided clearly unfair to quebec

[Jala 922]

Why?

 

Why is this trade being made not why should it be voided lol

Edited May 12, 2016 by Jala

[Phil 5,156]

[jack 498]

  On 5/12/2016 at 1:18 AM, Jala said:

Why?

 

Why is this trade being made not why should it be voided lol

Expand  

 

2 part trade

[evrydayimbyfuglien 600]

I'll withhold judgement until I see part two lol

[Da Trifecta 1,903]

I highly doubt this was the full trade lol. Brovy may not be the smartest guy at trading, but no way he does this without a reason.

[evrydayimbyfuglien 600]

  On 5/12/2016 at 1:37 AM, Da Trifecta said:

I highly doubt this was the full trade lol. Brovy may not be the smartest guy at trading, but no way he does this without a reason.

Expand  

Yeah. I'm just waiting for part deux 

[Kendrick 4,742]

I think this was part 2 actually, I remember Boubabi talking about how Quebec owed them.

[boubabi 4,727]

tor actually

[evrydayimbyfuglien 600]

@Banackock

This is what I considered "trading up" for lack of a better term.

[Banackock 8,576]

  On 5/12/2016 at 3:35 AM, evrydayimbyfuglien said:

@Banackock

This is what I considered "trading up" for lack of a better term.

Expand  

oh lol

[Kesler 1,515]

aha I got a good laugh from this thread

[Will 4,662]

  On 5/12/2016 at 2:22 AM, boubabi said:

tor actually

Expand  

jala 

[Victor 11,247]

Better not be draft pick rule circumvention cuz then this shit void.

[jack 498]

  On 5/12/2016 at 12:37 PM, Victor said:

Better not be draft pick rule circumvention cuz then this shit void.

Expand  

 

it's not

[Knight 1,337]

If I were a GM now I'd definitely do a two-part trade to my advantage and not fulfill the other part of the deal.

[BOOM 9,139]

But you're a cold sob.

[Victor 11,247]

What I don't understand is why these early trades don't involve equivalent picks. That's a much better guarantee to get the team with the advantage to hold up their side of the bargain.

 

"K, here's S49 2nd, I'll take your S51 2nd and trade it back in part 2 along whatever else we agreed to."

 

 

and less questions asked since it's not obviously a multi-part trade.

 

GMs, you guys dumb as fuck

[Molholt 2,185]

You can't trade back an asset that quickly, unless it doesn't apply to picks.

 

If I was Stockholm I would 100% not do part 2, they deserve it.

[Victor 11,247]

  On 5/12/2016 at 2:41 PM, Molholt said:

You can't trade back an asset that quickly, unless it doesn't apply to picks.

 

If I was Stockholm I would 100% not do part 2, they deserve it.

Expand  

lol definitely no restriction on picks

[boubabi 4,727]

Jala created a tradition as we can see

[Knight 1,337]

  On 5/12/2016 at 2:29 PM, Victor said:

What I don't understand is why these early trades don't involve equivalent picks. That's a much better guarantee to get the team with the advantage to hold up their side of the bargain.

 

"K, here's S49 2nd, I'll take your S51 2nd and trade it back in part 2 along whatever else we agreed to."

 

 

and less questions asked since it's not obviously a multi-part trade.

 

GMs, you guys dumb as fuck

Expand  

 

Want to be GMs again?