eaglesfan036

87 Helsinki Titans @ New York Americans 88 Toronto Legion @ Riga Reign 89 Calgary Wranglers @ Quebec City Meute 90 Seattle Bears @ HC Davos Dynamo

Review: Congrats on making it to the first line scrub! Quebec is definitely tanking putting you up there. You guys have a lot of talent but seem to be struggling for some reason ?

Review: A good summary of the VHLM action so far. The VHL usually gets much more coverage so it is fun to see what is going on in the minors. I bet @Gooningitup is happy to see he leads in hits. Also surprising to see Edvin in 1st for points.

1) What was your favorite season as a GM? 2) What was your favorite non-GM season just as a player? 3) Do you remember when New York beat Riga in the finals, then you traded for me and we lost to Riga in the finals the next year? 4) I remember you, Devise, and Jericho all actually met up in real life one time. Has that happened again? 5) Excluding possibly yourself, who do you think is the best VHL GM in history?

someone reads my articles Also like others have said, don't bother putting your tpe into discipline.

why is this done on google docs but vhl pick em is done in the thread? How am i supposed to copy others?

klose one

Americans 2-1

New York Riga Seattle Calgary

Brick Wahl

That's still breaking the rules

unless the rules have changed, I don't believe you can trade draft picks more than two seasons in advance

Ok I'll take Borwin and the highest tpe goalie left

I'm confused am I up lol

I didn't know VHL GMs get paid 2 tpe too. Personally I would be a GM regardless of TPE pay, but if I ever were to become one again I wouldn't be opposed to it ?

VHLM GMs originally got paid because back in the day no one wanted to be a GM/ we didn't have enough actives so we had to provide an incentive to have people take the job I no longer think we need to provide that incentive

ok you are right that draft didn't even have a second round ? At least it had a HoF goalie haha

Hey the #6 pick in that draft was amazing and won rookie of the year for Riga! Clearly a steal and definitely didn't go inactive

From this regression, Checking has the 4th highest positive coefficient in relation to points, so an argument can be made that is certainly is impactful in getting more points.

This discussion has motivated me, my next regression is going to be about how upgrading checking impacts expected hits, PIMS, points, etc