Jump to content

Nykonax

BOG
  • Posts

    3,412
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by Nykonax

  1. 11 hours ago, MubbleFubbles said:

    Pearce - Janser - Lavelle

    Leduc - Board Game - BOT

     

    Johansson - BOT

    Torq - BOT)

    i wonder if these are optimal lines. would love to see a forward swapped with a D and see what happens since I feel like on a forward line if 2 of them are good the 3rd one just doesn't matter + the bot on the line would lead to more production I think. Then having a 3rd dman would probably work better defensively.

  2. 34 minutes ago, thadthrasher said:

    I don't think we ever solidified this, but since Biography requires twice the length for words, should it also be twice the length for podcasts. So, instead of a 10 podcast like all the others, a 20 minute one instead? I'm trying to finalize the new guidelines.

    I don't know much about efforts of podcasts compared to media spots, but if you think doubling length of an article is equivalent to doubling the length of a podcast then go for it. I do feel like a 20 min podcast on the biography is a lot though, but not sure it really matters since I doubt many people will be doing podcasts for it.

  3. 8 minutes ago, badcolethetitan said:

    "Yep. I believe that we are very close to being able to make that run and win a championship. Like I said earlier, we've got some great talent up and coming and on top of that, we have players who want to be apart of that solution. Players who want to win for the organization, and vice versa. I think it should be very soon and we'll be lifting that trophy."

    :kekw:

  4. 2 hours ago, jacobcarson877 said:

    :dcd:D.C. Dragons :dcd: 

    C+

     

    The D.C Dragons did not pick until 47th overall to be fair, but the reigning champions took some risks at the draft. Aky has updated recently, although hasn’t updated consistently since September. Lucas Grey may back claim a few months worth of TPE, which would obviously change everything here, but I won’t bet on it until it happens. Telker Jr is an ode to a user lost to history (for now). Grey could be a steal, gaining months of Auto 12 but I still don’t feel great about it.

    way to go @Enorama!! C's get degrees

  5. 1 hour ago, Beketov said:

    Assuming there is any kind of TPE reward for it if we allow GM’s to choose the players it will definitely not go to the most deserving but rather the people they feel could use the uncapped. Better to just be impartial with the decision.

    Just make it 1 or 2 uncapped and like who cares. IMO its not really a huge deal. When it happened in previous seasons it really didn't impact my enjoyment at all, and probably increased the enjoyment for some of those "undeserving" players. You may not end up with the actual 32 all-stars, but maybe GMs will choose people whl are deserving because of their LR presence or whatever. If you want to form a whole All-Star Committee then I mean that can be done, just seems like a whole lot more work for very little, if any, gain.

  6. 5 hours ago, Beketov said:

    If we did want to bring it back I’m 100% against the old “every team sends a player and then the league votes on the rest” as that became a nightmare where 90% of the players sent by teams were intentionally undeserving so that they could get in and the people who would deserve it would get voted in anyway.

    Do you remember what the roster requirements were? Could just have teams each send 2 or 3 players. If 3 is too many can just have the top x teams in each conference get to send 1 more. But I'm definitely in favour of bringing it back. Maybe give VSN the production and give extra pay to whoever makes the rosters in game. Maybe a doubles week or something

  7. 1 minute ago, Alex said:

    As someone who has always thought this was an amazing idea, although I do have 1 quick question that I should have thought of sooner. Is there a way to disable this in the offseason/playoffs so that the JST teams can still claim waivers the old fashioned way?

     

    4 hours ago, Spartan said:

    This system will also be deactivated from the start of the playoffs until the conclusion of the VHLM Draft. Any creates during playoffs or the offseason will need to be signed via written pitch in their new create thread, as was the common practice.

     

    hmmm im not sure. good question alex!

  8. 1 hour ago, dart said:

    is there any chance we can get a comprehensive guide onto what each attribute/tpe spent will equal too in statistical output. 

     

    37 minutes ago, jacobcarson877 said:

    Yeah there's no real function where x attribute gives you y result. By my own personal and very not intense research MOST 30 goal players in the VHL have 86+ scoring, and their scoring stat 15+ higher than their passing stat. 83 scoring seems to be what I see as a baseline for 20 goals?

    there is actually *kinda* is!

     

    @Squidwarddid a regression analysis like a few years ago.

     


    unfortunately a lot of the images have been lost to time I guess, maybe if he's alive he can give more insight. But you can read his conclusions and somewhat get an idea. I find it really interesting that it showed passing was negatively correlated with goals/assists/points before we even knew about meta. also shows that skating isn't really important which was found to be true in SHL for STHS 1.5, but I assume it's somewhat similar for us too. Also note that when he says 1 TPE increase I think that means 1 increase in an STHS attribute. Eagle's sample is really small though just one season, but down the line I want to redo this with more data.

×
×
  • Create New...