TBF I think it paints the picture more clearly/is more explainable to have actual results of a simulation to talk about. It’s also more fun for me to say I simmed each matchup for 175ish series than to just calculate the probability directly; we are a sim league after all. This is why engineering > math.
Something that would have been even simpler to do would be to stay on Discord a little longer, because @LucyXpher talked about how Malmo’s morale was higher than Riga’s in this past series—so the idea that it’s a matter of some weird wild-card winner morale boost is completely false to begin with.
Regardless of how you do it, something I think is interesting is that regular-season points seem to be a very good indicator of playoff success with my average outcomes matching Victor’s historical numbers pretty much exactly. With that being the case, I was also surprised to find out that most matchups are something like 60-40 in favor of the #1 team, and even the most mismatched ones are about 70-30. In general, I’d totally agree that people don’t get randomness and think the playoffs should be completely deterministic. I’ve seen far worse examples of “the league needs to change the way it works because I lost,” based on much less, going back to my first season here. It’s never going to cease to exist in the VHL, and it’s always going to be a little bit annoying, which is probably why I felt the need to analyze it before it turned into something bigger and weirder.