Jump to content

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Advantage said:

So does it have to be posted or everything accepted by 8? Lol.  Trade posted at 8..so wasnt sure

Guess there's no clarification in the rules. Thus, imo, legal? idk

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/38367-hskcol-s53/#findComment-418239
Share on other sites

Just now, Higgins said:

 

For as long as I've been a GM it's been, has to be posted before the deadline.

Has to be posted, yeah. But there's nothing on a NTC being waived or w/e.

 

Tricky, sticky.

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/38367-hskcol-s53/#findComment-418241
Share on other sites

Just now, Banackock said:

Has to be posted, yeah. But there's nothing on a NTC being waived or w/e.

 

Tricky, sticky.

 

True, but as we are a global league with people in different time zones it's hard to expect a player to waive if a trade is posted minutes to the deadline.

 

At some point it just has to be assumed not waived though.

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/38367-hskcol-s53/#findComment-418243
Share on other sites

This whole deadline has been a fuckery. But in my not at all official opinion, this trade probably shouldn't go through. If not for the 8:01 PM acceptance (which I'm fine with honestly), then because Covington wasn't on Cologne when this trade was posted.

 

That said, to play my own devil's advocate, if the original trade was posted as a three-way trade with this deal included, it would be fine. So in a way this could be considered a three-way trade to the original. But officially it isn't, so idk. You guys are all stupid.

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/38367-hskcol-s53/#findComment-418492
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, JardyB10 said:

This whole deadline has been a fuckery. But in my not at all official opinion, this trade probably shouldn't go through. If not for the 8:01 PM acceptance (which I'm fine with honestly), then because Covington wasn't on Cologne when this trade was posted.

 

That said, to play my own devil's advocate, if the original trade was posted as a three-way trade with this deal included, it would be fine. So in a way this could be considered a three-way trade to the original. But officially it isn't, so idk. You guys are all stupid.

 

What are you talking about, this would have been voided if Covington did not waive his NTC. Simple. Put it through.

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/38367-hskcol-s53/#findComment-418655
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Molholt said:

Robbie never waived his NTC for this trade? I mean he posted in the other thread but never here. I mean it's not like waiving it for one trade means it's waived forever. 

 

So.....

 

2.7 – Clauses
There are two types of clauses that can be included in contracts (both are voided if waived once)

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/38367-hskcol-s53/#findComment-418661
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Molholt said:

Robbie never waived his NTC for this trade? I mean he posted in the other thread but never here. I mean it's not like waiving it for one trade means it's waived forever. 

 

So.....

Actually, yes, it is like that.

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/38367-hskcol-s53/#findComment-418666
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Higgins said:

 

What are you talking about, this would have been voided if Covington did not waive his NTC. Simple. Put it through.

 

I think Jardy was more talking about making and posting an official trade before a player was even legally on a roster. If it wasn't the deadline, you wouldn't post this trade until you knew if Robbie waived or not. Because you had no choice but to wait, should this trade be considered legal? Technically you tried to put in an official trade before a player was put on a roster. 

 

But this whole mess (that I ironically started) is for you guys to sort out. :P 

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/38367-hskcol-s53/#findComment-418703
Share on other sites

  • Commissioner
1 hour ago, Devise said:

 

I think Jardy was more talking about making and posting an official trade before a player was even legally on a roster. If it wasn't the deadline, you wouldn't post this trade until you knew if Robbie waived or not. Because you had no choice but to wait, should this trade be considered legal? Technically you tried to put in an official trade before a player was put on a roster. 

 

But this whole mess (that I ironically started) is for you guys to sort out. :P 

That's how I've been looking at this whole mess. Personally I'm fine with the trade to Cologne and I understand the argument that players should be able to waive after the deadline. That just makes logical sense. But the problem isn't Robbie waiving for this trade, it's him waiving for the other one. When this trade was posted Zimmers wasn't on the team so the trade would effectively be void until such time as he was; putting it past the deadline.

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/38367-hskcol-s53/#findComment-418750
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...