Jump to content

S75 Brett Slobodzian Trophy Voting


Victor

S75 Brett Slobodzian Trophy Voting   

166 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you think was individually the most outstanding player in the VHL in S75?

    • Stone Wolski (DCD) - 65GP, 36-21-7, 0.930SV%, 2.45GAA, 5SO, 2273SA
      50
    • John Merrick (TOR) - 45G, 62A, 107P, 10, 41PIM, 109HIT, 42SB
      43
    • Guy Lesieur (DCD) - 47G, 43A, 90P, 28, 10PIM, 23HIT, 54SB
      5
    • Mikko Lahtinen (MOS) - 36G, 63A, 99P, 13, 165PIM, 374HIT, 31SB
      21
    • Andrew Su (VAN) - 43G, 63A, 106P, 27, 58PIM, 79HIT, 25SB
      14
    • Condor Adrienne (MAL) - 20G, 70A, 90P, 29, 192PIM, 291HIT, 142SB
      32

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

  • Victor featured this topic
17 minutes ago, Victor said:

I think I actually always did but forgot. But everyone but Adrienne and Wolski is a forward.

Yeah, and it definitely isn't too hard to look up but its a nice value add

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tough vote, nobody really stands out far and wide ahead of the others. Lahts has the hits and his points aren't bad but 36 goals isn't nearly as impressive as it could be. I'd consider the hit advantage more if he was at the 40+ tier there. I went with Su but I was pretty conflicted between Su, Condor, Guy, Lahts and Merrick. I'd love to give it to the goalie here especially with a .930 save percentage but the goals against is hard to call "outstanding" even in the context of the era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Devise said:

Tough vote, nobody really stands out far and wide ahead of the others. Lahts has the hits and his points aren't bad but 36 goals isn't nearly as impressive as it could be. I'd consider the hit advantage more if he was at the 40+ tier there. I went with Su but I was pretty conflicted between Su, Condor, Guy, Lahts and Merrick. I'd love to give it to the goalie here especially with a .930 save percentage but the goals against is hard to call "outstanding" even in the context of the era. 

My argument against Su is that it is basically the worse version of Merrick. His only positive stat is that he had a higher +/-, but he should given that he was on Vancouver (though that could be a knock against Merrick's SB, considering he was on Toronto). They are really close for me tbf, but I think Merrick is just mathematically a bit better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Victor unfeatured this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...