InstantRockstar

you'll need to learn to take constructive criticism if you're ever going to improve. If you seen some of my graphics from when I first began to what they are now, it looks like a completely different person is making them. You take it with a grain of salt and you get better. Don't discourage yourself because people think some things are wrong with it. If I told you this looked money and it doesn't, how would you improve? If you don't want to get the criticism in the future of your postings, post that in your thread that you don't want it reviewed and I'll skip it out of respect But I'd think people would wanna get better?

review: while this is large, this is sweet, could be a nice phone background. coloring is nice, JC color change is nice, logo looks like it's meant to be there, it just is fresh, super basic but honestly I love the colors.

review: color stands out to me right away, very bold and vibrant, nice flow, font choice was nice, it blends well. Lighting is good, blending is good, I really have 0 complaints about this piece.

review: you big canvas bois, showing up as a squad or smth? lol. ill be honest not much done to this, slapped some text on it and a border, the only thing that saves it for me is the jersey change on the back.

review: I hate boosting your ego but this is straight sex as always. colors are nice and festive, it's for a good cause, you're a saint, the only thing I'd like is some more drop shadow on "annual" to make it show up just a bit more, on a white background it is harder to see.

review: I just gave someone grief for huge graphics, #3 here we come hahaha. In all serious though, you at least used the large canvas size to good use, does feel a little empty around the edges but your eye is drawn to the middle anyways and it all blends well, good job.

review: people love HUGE graphics, I'll be honest I'm not a fan. It leaves a lot of empty space on the middle and right side, due to all the font being on the left and not spread throughout the whole graphic. Otherwise the coloring, blending is nice, I feel like if this was "normal" size it'd likely mesh well.

review: it has nice colors, the graphic is a little darker than I'd like but it's not overwhelming dark. font choice isn't bad but the coloring on it is a little hard to see, some background on that or even drop shadow would've made it pop a bit more. overall good.

review: color scheme fits the team, his face being blue is a little meh but honestly not a bad graphic, the name in the left is good and the font to the right isn't bad, a little empty on the bottom but again not a huge deal.

http://efl.network/topic/13201-reppin-the-gang-gang-shit/?do=findComment&comment=203464 +6

Hi ho it’s off to get TPE I go.

yusssssss

3 tpez

tpez

Review: this is nice, some good stock work, decent lighting, good font work, could've preferred it over the render but no major complaints

Review: some trippy sigs out here this week, I like it. Looks good, overall some crazy colors, bendy font work, not too bad.

Review: bsic but not bad, this is literally only missing some stock work for it to be elite, cause it has the potential.

Review: this is kinda fun, a neat concept, not much to it, but I just like what it actually is. good work.

Review: yeah...your sigs are straight sex and you know it, this is just...beyond words

Review: this one doesn't quite do it for me as much as your last. This one doesn't have as much to it as the last, but again its not bad, I feel like more stock work would've complete it.

Review: i felt this sig as I looked at it, the more I looked, the higher I felt, it's one of those "trippy" sigs I like the style, everything meshes well, gj

Review: not a bad graphic here, a little large for my liking, but the stock work is getting there, and the render blending is there, I would just have minor tweaks made to the font to make it all blend in, and it'd be even better.

https://sba.today/forums/index.php?/topic/43813-sorry-if-this-hurts-your-feelings/ 6

1 tpez plz

1 tpez