Jump to content

Reviewing Re-work


Beaviss

Recommended Posts

Reviewing Re-work

@Members

 

The VHL’s reviewing system, as it stands, mostly stems from the way it was designed back when we had grading as a paid job. Several seasons ago, however, we made it open to everyone and didn’t effectively change the way it worked which made it so very few people were interested in partaking. We have looked all all the suggestions and personal messages that we received and we came up with the following.

 

Reviewing should now consist of at least 1 Constructive Paragraph for 1 Capped TPE each. You may do up to 2 Reviews Weekly and they must include a score out of 10 on top of the constructive criticism that they would normally contain. The score is purely for the person doing the PT to see at a glance how they did, it does not affect final TPE payout which remains as auto-6.

 

What these changes also means you do not require @DollarAndADream to accept your reviews. He will remain on as head of PT in order to handle disputes regarding both reviewing and quality of PT’s however claiming reviewing will now be under the discretion of the @Updaters Team. We will also be removing the cap on how many reviews a single post can have.

 

While we recognize that this means fewer reviews per week from the people who were doing it we hope that it also makes it more accessible as a means of getting to the weekly cap which should give us a net gain in the amount of reviews the league receives.

 

Thank you to the following people championing these changes. @Proto @DollarAndADream @Sonnet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Beaviss said:

Reviewing Re-work

@Members

 

The VHL’s reviewing system, as it stands, mostly stems from the way it was designed back when we had grading as a paid job. Several seasons ago, however, we made it open to everyone and didn’t effectively change the way it worked which made it so very few people were interested in partaking. We have looked all all the suggestions and personal messages that we received and we came up with the following.

 

Reviewing should now consist of at least 1 Constructive Paragraph for 1 Capped TPE each. You may do up to 2 Reviews Weekly and they must include a score out of 10 on top of the constructive criticism that they would normally contain. The score is purely for the person doing the PT to see at a glance how they did, it does not affect final TPE payout which remains as auto-6.

 

What these changes also means you do not require @DollarAndADream to accept your reviews. He will remain on as head of PT in order to handle disputes regarding both reviewing and quality of PT’s however claiming reviewing will now be under the discretion of the @Updaters Team. We will also be removing the cap on how many reviews a single post can have.

 

While we recognize that this means fewer reviews per week from the people who were doing it we hope that it also makes it more accessible as a means of getting to the weekly cap which should give us a net gain in the amount of reviews the league receives.

 

Thank you to the following people championing these changes. @Proto @DollarAndADream @Sonnet

I’ve done this in almost all of my reviews @DollarAndADream knows it, so this is a great change, and my scores will stay 6.9/10 for you guys. That is if I ever review I’m so fucking lazy man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, tfong said:

I feel like this could've used some graphics and a bit of color.

 

REVIEW: 4/10, Constructive advice but you need to give it a rating out of ten. Also you misspelled colour so you lost a point there. Maybe next time use a heading or state that it is a review. Overall good job and look forward to reading more reviews in the future from you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DollarAndADream said:

That's not true. He's away from the VHL doing real life things sometimes. That benefits the VHL.

 

mad talladega nights GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Moderator
On 3/16/2020 at 6:29 PM, Berocka said:

REVIEW: 4/10, Constructive advice but you need to give it a rating out of ten. Also you misspelled colour so you lost a point there. Maybe next time use a heading or state that it is a review. Overall good job and look forward to reading more reviews in the future from you.

 

Colour is the correct way of spelling your blasphemer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...